Federal Asymmetry and Intergovernmental Relations in Spain
نویسندگان
چکیده
Robert Agranoff School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University-Bloomington, USA and Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset Madrid, SPAIN Asymmetry in governing receives a fair amount of attention in Spain. Late in 2004 the Basque Country parliament put forth the Ibarretexe plan (named after the regional premier Juan José Ibarretexe), that attempts to redefine devolved regional autonomy and provide for a possible referendum on becoming “a free state associated with Spain.” Passed with last minute support from political sympathizers of the ETA terrorist group, Ibarretexe at a minimum has called for a parliamentary commission in Madrid to re-negotiate its statute of autonomy, that is the region’s sub-national constitutional equivalent. The response from the government in Madrid was to reject the plan, with Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero calling it secessionist, unconstitutional, and incompatible with a frontierless Europe. He has ruled out government-to-government negotiations in favor of a review of all seventeen original regional statutes, which is linked to his reform program. Catalonia has also called for a re-negotiation of its statute of autonomy. Its regional parliament passed revisions in Fall 2005 that would grant Catalonia an independent legal system, the right to raise taxes and negotiate payments to Madrid, and to be called “a nation.” The Socialist led Catalan government wants to collect all taxes like the Basques and Navarrenos do under special dejure arrangements. In regard to recognition as a nation, the premier Pasqual Maragall says “the statute does not have to be particular; the word nation is polygenic” (Economist 6-15-05 p. 48). A vote by the central parliament is not expected until protracted negotiations are undertaken during 2006. Foreword
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) on Nigerian Federalism: An Examination Intergovernmental Management (IGM) 1999-2007
Federalism is a political mechanism for promoting unityin-diversity in a heterogeneous society. The federal system through the IGR uses the IGM mechanism to provide understanding, cordiality balance and collaboration between and among units of government, and between government and the citizenry. In Nigeria’s federal relation, the IGR seems not to have facilitated the right harmonious interacti...
متن کاملThe Intergovernmental Politics of Internet Sales Taxation in the United States
This article examines the moratorium on Internet sales taxation in the U.S. through perspectives of federalism and intergovernmental relations. First, it provides a brief overview of the literature describing contemporary theories of federalism and intergovernmental relations in the U.S. Second, it describes the efforts of U.S. governors to shape federal policy on the issue with a specific focu...
متن کاملThe U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations: Unique Artifact of a Bygone Era
Th e U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) befi tted an era marked by low party polarization, bipartisanship, and cooperative federalism. Although the ACIR’s work was valuable, the growth of federal power, rise of party polarization, and the decline of bipartisanship, along with many other political, governmental, and social changes during its 37-year life (1959–96), ma...
متن کاملMain Intergovernmental Conflicts among Urban Management Actors of Small Cities Case Study: City of Natanz, Iran
There are studies about interlocal relations of local governance, but it would be unique to explain these in urban management mechanisms of unitary country in Middle East, like Iran. One of the important issues for the city's urban management system is its state actors’ interrelations and probable challenges of this process, which mentioned by terms like inter-local, intergovernmental, or inter...
متن کاملFederative coordination and decentralization: Brazilian experience in health.
This article deals with intergovernmental relations in health within the 20 years of implantation of the Unified Health System (SUS), in the light of the historical course of Brazilian federalism and its implications to health. Initially, a theoretical-conceptual review was carried out on the topic of federalism, social welfare and federative coordination of health, considering the internationa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005